ꢀ
ꢀ
张ꢀ 斌ꢀ 鉴定文书效力的法理分析———关于鉴定文书加盖公章的思考
可喜的一步。 只要我们真正确立了鉴定人负责机
制,合理整合鉴定权配置可能出现的问题和矛盾,鉴
定文书应否加盖公章的答案就不言自明了。
参考文献:
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
[
1]马宏俊.法律文书与司法改革[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2005.
2]金光正.司法鉴定学[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1995.
3]何家弘.新编证据法学[M].北京:法律出版社,2000.
4]毕玉谦.民事证据法判例实务研究[M].北京:法律出版社,2000.
5]何家弘.司法鉴定导论[M].北京:法律出版社,2000.
6]陈瑞华.司法鉴定制度之研究[C] / / 司法部法规教育司ꢁ 司法鉴定立法研究.北京:法律出版社,2002.
7]约翰·W·斯特龙.麦考密克论证证据[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004.
8]汪建成,等.刑事鉴定结论研究[J].中国刑事法杂志,2001,(2).
9]何家弘.证人制度研究[M].北京:人民法院出版社,2004.
Basic Jurisprudence of Expert Testimony Effect
ZHANG Bin
(
Law Institute, People’s University, Beijing, Beijing 100872 China)
Abstract:The practice that expert testimony does not have legal effect until it is affixed with an offi⁃
cial seal has corresponding legal grounds, which is of great significance in proving the legality of the testi⁃
mony subject, the normality of its preparation process and its admissibility. On the other hand, however,
the practice is likely to obscure the legal duties and liabilities of the testimony subject, make it difficult to
carry out its courtroom investigation, and challenge the professional qualification system of expert witness.
The affixation is not to be taken as a document normality issue, but to be dealt with in the light of expert
witness system reform, rational distribution of its right and its admission.
Key words:expert testimony; expert conclusion; format
[
责任编辑:苏雪梅]
4
1