log title

昏君乎?明君乎?

2009/9/9 0:25:04 人评论 次浏览 分类:历史学

 

作者: 张邦炜

英文标题:Reflection on the Image of Meng Chang the King in the Light of Historical Origin Study

中文副标题:孟昶形象问题的史源学思考

英文副标题:

中文关键词:后蜀;北宋;孟昶;昏君;明君;史源学

英文关键词:Houshu; Northern Song Dynasty; Meng Chang; fatuous king; wise king; Historical Origin Study

基金名称:
基金类别:

中文摘要:
    在北宋前期的两种历史文本中,后蜀后主孟昶有昏君和明君两种不同的形象。这两种不同的历史文本分别由北宋官方和蜀地士人书写,体现了北宋朝廷和蜀地民众的不同利益、不同意愿和不同感情。孟昶的昏君形象逐渐压倒明君形象,折射出蜀地民众对北宋朝廷从对立到认同的历史过程。

英文摘要:
    In the early Northern Song Dynasty there exist two historical records of the image of Meng Chang the king of Houshu as fatuous king or wise king, which, written by the Song authority and the Shu scholar respectively, embody the different interests, wishes and feelings of the Song court and the Shu populace. That the fatuous image gradually prevails over the wise image reflects the historical course from opposition to identification of the Shu populace in regard with the Song Dynasty.

下载文件    在线阅读
上一条: 没有上一条
下一条: 昏君乎?明君乎?